I said in the previous entry that I am not a “soft” kinda guy, so I prefer a harder lighting.  Someone asked what that meant, so here we go!  I found an example of what I consider is three-point-lighting at it’s best.  The configuration consists of the following:
1. A key light just off center in front to initially “light” the subject.
2. A fill light more off center in front to fill the shadowing.
3. A backlight behind the subject to give contrast from the background.
(Center is in relation to where the subject is looking, not the camera or where the interviewer would sit when asking questions).

Even though this is the most basic of lighting techniques, it is a time tested standard.  The dramatics of the lighting on screen are controlled by the contrast between the hardness of the key vs. the softness of the fill along with strength or brightness as a pair.  If the key is brightened and the fill is dimmed, then the subject will have more defined shadows.

Below is an example of hard vs. soft:

The first technique uses tungsten lights with the classic umbrella and diffusion paper.  The second uses all softboxes.  Though both very well lit, I prefer the first photo.  The edges of the shadowing have harder lines. Notice the chin shadow on her lapel.  Also, notice the sheen of her hair from the backlight.  This feels more natural to me and the source of the light seems more believable.  The second shot seems to be more of a photograph taken in a mall somewhere; bright and happy and a little bit washed.  If the subject of your work is dark and you are looking for a more dramatic look, the soft technique doesn’t lend itself to be as versatile.  When you back off of a soft set-up, it tends to just simply look dark; not dramatic.

Note:  I am in no way pretending to be an expert on the matter.  These are just my thoughts and observations. Comments? Do it!

|JONNYHEE|

 Photos courteusy: lowel.com